I am an admirer of rarities, though I am not a rarities collector. As soon as a comma is involved in the price tag, I balk, and since nowadays even many of the not-as-rare rarities easily command four figures, I’m priced out pretty quickly.
The exception to that - the exception to every collecting rule I’ve ever set for myself along the way - is Sham.
The exception to that - the exception to every collecting rule I’ve ever set for myself along the way - is Sham.
- I don't collect decos or unicorns: Lavinia (purchased 2001)
- I don't collect multiples of the same model: #410 (11), #411 (2), #812 (3), glossy Sears SR (2), #3162 (3), #3163 (2), Best Choice (2), The Black Stallion (3)
- I don't collect breakable things: Galaxias (purchased 2011)
- I don't collect unpainted models: Naked Shams x4 (purchased in 2014, 2016, and 2018)
- I don't collect autographed models: Rudish Sham #1 (purchased 2014) and Rudish Sham #2 (purchased 2015)
- I don't collect models on lamps: Sham-on-a-lamp (purchased at BreyerFest 2015)
- I don't collect models with boxes: #410 with 80s box (purchased 2015), #410 with Sears box (purchased 2018)
- I don't collect culls: #812 from ebay (purchased 2018)
- I don't spend a comma on models: Smurfy (purchased 2020) and this guy, purchased in 2023, the subject of today's post:
On July 6, 2023, a seller posted this test Sham for sale on the Rare Model Horse Sales page on Facebook. This is what she wrote about him:
“Ever since I bought this handsome guy from a fellow collector (who knew very little about him other than she had bought him from an estate sale a few years ago), I knew he was something special. I attempted to research who he is and where he came from, and this is what I managed to find out:
This vintage Sham is a semi-OOAK Marney Walerius test model, part of an extremely limited run of models that she had brought with her as gifts for the judges of a show that was held in Texas, back in the 1980's. It is my understanding that not one of these models were exactly alike, even if a few look very similar to each other; there were small differences between each one, as they were not all painted exactly the same. This particular guy is a rich, dark red chestnut, with what is called a "skunk tail" (flaxen at the base, and fading into red), with four white socks and very light pink/cream colored hooves. He also features the classic "wheat ear" marking on his chest that all vintage Shams originally had (before Breyer decided to stop releasing the Sham mold with this marking, as too many people were mistaking it as a flaw).”
The seller had quite a lengthy want list as possible trades, so I was optimistic we could work something out. Unfortunately, I didn’t have anything she wanted that was worth near the test Sham’s value. I reached out to her anyway, and over the course of the next few weeks, as we waited through her initial offer period and then some additional time as another interested party waffled back and forth on a final offer, we had some long and enjoyable conversations over Messenger about our mutual love of Sham and other Breyer Arabians.
Eventually, the other interested party withdrew, and the seller and I agreed on a trade - her test Sham for my Sanibel web special and quite a bit of cash to make up the difference in value.
I’d seen lots of pictures of the Sham at this point and was pretty convinced that he was what she said he was, but you never really know until you have the model in hand. In the time between when I paid for him and when he arrived, I half-convinced myself that he was just a cull of #410 and that I had grossly overspent.
As soon as I opened him, that worry disappeared.
“Ever since I bought this handsome guy from a fellow collector (who knew very little about him other than she had bought him from an estate sale a few years ago), I knew he was something special. I attempted to research who he is and where he came from, and this is what I managed to find out:
This vintage Sham is a semi-OOAK Marney Walerius test model, part of an extremely limited run of models that she had brought with her as gifts for the judges of a show that was held in Texas, back in the 1980's. It is my understanding that not one of these models were exactly alike, even if a few look very similar to each other; there were small differences between each one, as they were not all painted exactly the same. This particular guy is a rich, dark red chestnut, with what is called a "skunk tail" (flaxen at the base, and fading into red), with four white socks and very light pink/cream colored hooves. He also features the classic "wheat ear" marking on his chest that all vintage Shams originally had (before Breyer decided to stop releasing the Sham mold with this marking, as too many people were mistaking it as a flaw).”
The seller had quite a lengthy want list as possible trades, so I was optimistic we could work something out. Unfortunately, I didn’t have anything she wanted that was worth near the test Sham’s value. I reached out to her anyway, and over the course of the next few weeks, as we waited through her initial offer period and then some additional time as another interested party waffled back and forth on a final offer, we had some long and enjoyable conversations over Messenger about our mutual love of Sham and other Breyer Arabians.
Eventually, the other interested party withdrew, and the seller and I agreed on a trade - her test Sham for my Sanibel web special and quite a bit of cash to make up the difference in value.
I’d seen lots of pictures of the Sham at this point and was pretty convinced that he was what she said he was, but you never really know until you have the model in hand. In the time between when I paid for him and when he arrived, I half-convinced myself that he was just a cull of #410 and that I had grossly overspent.
As soon as I opened him, that worry disappeared.
He is so, so different in color from the regular #410 Shams. I put him next to my darkest and lightest #410s and it’s not even close. I have no doubt he’s original finish with a fully-executed paint job, and exactly what the seller was told he is - a Marney test from the mid-80s.
He’s got typical 80s seams, the wheat ear, and even some overspray on one fetlock, and his body color matches the chestnut Marney test on IDYB, though that one has a black nose and black hooves. The subtle difference supports the information the seller was told - that this might have been a small run, but each model was unique.
I knew right away that I was going to show him, so he needed a name. As a test, he obviously wasn't issued with a name, so I had nothing to work with. I wanted something that conveyed how momentous he is and also humorously reflected the sticker shock I had after buying him. Aftershock seemed a good fit - especially because he’s red, like the cinnamon liqueur.
If I have to limit myself to only one test model in my collection, I’m super happy it’s this one.
I knew right away that I was going to show him, so he needed a name. As a test, he obviously wasn't issued with a name, so I had nothing to work with. I wanted something that conveyed how momentous he is and also humorously reflected the sticker shock I had after buying him. Aftershock seemed a good fit - especially because he’s red, like the cinnamon liqueur.
If I have to limit myself to only one test model in my collection, I’m super happy it’s this one.














